If a witness's statement contains inconsistent details, what is the recommended action?

• A. Ignore inconsistencies.
• B. Re-interview to verify details.
• C. Delete the inconsistent portions.
• D. Submit as is.

Answer: (B)

When a witness’s statement has inconsistent details, the right move is to re-interview to verify and clarify what was said. Memory can be imperfect, especially under stress or after time has passed, so a follow-up interview helps distinguish which details are solid and which need correction. It also gives the witness another chance to recall information in their own words, reducing the risk of misinterpretation or forgotten facts.

This approach also lets you compare the updated account with other evidence or statements, fill in gaps, and document any changes carefully. Preserving the original content while seeking clarification maintains the integrity of the record and helps build a reliable narrative for later review. Ignoring inconsistencies, deleting parts, or submitting the statement as-is would risk credibility and leave important questions unresolved.